Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989

Caste-based violence still harms lives across India. Therefore, every citizen should understand how the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 works. In short, this guide explains the law in plain words. It covers offences, punishments, complaints, bail, relief, and court rulings. Moreover, it breaks down the latest Supreme Court judgment of August 2026. Read on to learn your rights, duties, and legal options.

What Is the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989?

The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 is a special criminal law of India. It punishes atrocities committed by non-members against members of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). In addition, the law creates Special Courts, protects victims and witnesses, and provides relief and rehabilitation. Notably, Parliament enacted it on 11 September 1989. Subsequently, it came into force on 30 January 1990.

Quick Facts About the Act

• Short title: The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
• Act number: 33 of 1989
• Administering ministry: Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
• Major amendments: 2015 and 2018
• Key rules: SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995, amended in 2016

Main Objectives of the Law

The Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 pursues three goals. First, it aims to prevent atrocities before they happen. Second, it seeks speedy and fair trials through Special Courts. Third, it offers relief and rehabilitation to victims and their families. Together, these goals shape every provision in the statute.

Why People Search for This Law

Indeed, most readers want clear answers. For example, many ask what counts as an atrocity. Others want to know how to file a complaint or whether bail is possible. Likewise, employers and institutions want to avoid legal risk. This guide answers each concern step by step.

Why Parliament Passed the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989

Independent India abolished untouchability through Article 17 of the Constitution. Further, Article 46 directs the State to protect weaker sections from social injustice and exploitation. Nevertheless, violence against SC and ST communities continued. The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, covered untouchability but not wider atrocities. As a result, Parliament needed a stronger and special statute.

Constitutional Foundations

The Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 rests on equality and dignity. Article 14 guarantees equality before law. Moreover, Article 15 bars discrimination on grounds of caste. Likewise, Article 21 protects life and personal liberty. Together, these provisions justify special protection for historically oppressed groups.

The Gap the Law Fills

Initially, ordinary criminal law treated caste atrocities like any other offence. However, victims faced social pressure, delay, and police apathy. Moreover, many humiliating acts had no clear label in older laws. Therefore, the 1989 statute defined “atrocity” and set harsher penalties.

Meanwhile, the 2015 amendment widened the list of offences and created Exclusive Special Courts. The 2018 amendment then added Section 18A. Together, these changes show how the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 keeps evolving.

Who Is Protected Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989?

Protected Persons

The Act protects members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution define these groups. In addition, presidential orders list the communities in each State. Consequently, proof of status usually rests on a valid caste or tribe certificate.

Who Can Be an Accused

Generally, the accused must not belong to an SC or ST. Courts have stressed this point repeatedly. Therefore, a dispute between two SC members, or between two ST members, falls outside the Act. Ordinary criminal law governs such disputes instead. However, the law also punishes public servants who neglect their duties under it. Notably, Section 4 applies to public servants who are not SC or ST members.

The Presumption of Knowledge

Meanwhile, Section 8 helps victims. If the accused personally knew the victim or the family, the court presumes awareness of the caste identity. Nevertheless, the accused can rebut this presumption with evidence. Thus, the burden shifts, but it does not disappear.

Key Offences Under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989: What Counts as an Atrocity?

Offences Under Section 3(1)

Section 3(1) lists more than two dozen offences. Some involve humiliating physical acts. For instance, forcing a person to eat or drink an inedible substance is an offence. Dumping waste or carcasses near a victim’s home also qualifies. Likewise, forcibly removing clothes or parading a person naked is punishable.

Besides, other offences target property and livelihood. Wrongful occupation of land allotted to an SC or ST member falls within the law. Similarly, forced or bonded labour is covered. In addition, the Act reaches sexual offences and acts that spread hatred through words, signs, or visible images.

Offences by Public Servants

Section 4 punishes public servants who neglect their duties under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989. These duties include recording FIRs, reading information back to the informant, and preparing chargesheets promptly. As a result, accountability extends beyond the original offender.

Offences Under Section 3(2)

Next, Section 3(2) deals with graver crimes. For example, fabricating false evidence to get an SC or ST member convicted of a capital offence draws life imprisonment. Importantly, committing a serious penal offence against an SC or ST member can also lead to life imprisonment. This applies where the original offence carries ten years or more, and the act targets the victim on grounds of caste or tribe status.

The Public View Test: How Courts Read Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s)

Courts apply this test strictly under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. Section 3(1)(r) punishes intentional insult or intimidation, with intent to humiliate an SC or ST member, in any place within public view. Similarly, Section 3(1)(s) punishes abuse by caste name in the same setting. Accordingly, both clauses carry strict ingredients.

Ingredients the Prosecution Must Prove

• The accused does not belong to an SC or ST.
• An SC or ST member is the victim.
• Intent drives the act.
• Humiliation on caste grounds is the aim.
• A place within public view hosts the incident.

What Public View Means

In Hitesh Verma v. State of Uttarakhand (2020), the Supreme Court explained the phrase. A place within public view is open, so members of the public can see or hear the act. By contrast, a closed private room does not qualify. Later, in Karuppudayar v. State (2025), the Court applied this reasoning to abuse inside a government officer’s chamber with no one else present. As a result, the SC/ST charge failed.

Practical Takeaway for Complainants

Complainants should name who was present. Witness statements should say who heard the words. Besides, the FIR should state the exact place and the words used. Thus, courts can test the public view element at an early stage. Careful drafting also protects a genuine claim under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989.

Why Intent Matters

Importantly, mere insult is not enough. Instead, the insult must connect to the victim’s caste or tribe. Consequently, a personal quarrel between two people does not automatically attract the Act.

Punishments Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989

The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 sets penalties by offence type. Generally, the law prescribes harsher punishment than ordinary criminal law. The table below shows the main provisions.

Additional Consequences

However, punishment does not stop at jail time. Under Section 7, the Special Court may forfeit property used to commit the offence. Section 16 allows the State to impose a collective fine on inhabitants who help or tolerate such offences. In addition, Section 19 blocks probation benefits for convicts under the Act. Courts may also impose these penalties alongside punishment under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Thus, a conviction under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 carries penal, financial, and social consequences.

How to File a Complaint Under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989

Follow these steps to start legal action.

1. Go to the police station. Anyone can give information orally or in writing. The officer must record it, read it back, and hand you a free copy.
2. Demand FIR registration. The offences are cognizable. Besides, Section 18A removes the need for a preliminary inquiry before an FIR.
3. Escalate if police refuse. Write to the Superintendent of Police. Alternatively, approach the Special Court or the magistrate.
4. Preserve your evidence. Save photos, videos, call records, and witness names. Keep your caste certificate ready.
5. Seek medical examination when injury exists. Doctors’ notes also support relief payments.
6. Request protection and relief. Apply to the district authorities under the Rules and Section 15A.

Notably, a public servant who wilfully ignores these duties faces punishment under Section 4.

Drafting Tips for a Strong Complaint

Write the complaint in simple, precise language. State the date, time, and place. Quote the words used, if you can. Mention how the accused knew the victim’s caste. Finally, list witnesses with contact details. A well-drafted complaint under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 avoids later disputes about the facts.

Investigation and Trial Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989: Special Courts and Timelines

Who Investigates

The Rules under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 require an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police to investigate these cases. Moreover, the investigation and chargesheet should be completed within 60 days. This rule aims to curb delay. Furthermore, senior officers monitor progress under the Rules. Therefore, police delay can trigger action under Section 4.

Where the Trial Happens

First, each State designates Special Courts. Where case numbers are high, it sets up Exclusive Special Courts. These courts take cognisance directly, without a committal order. Special Public Prosecutors, appointed under Section 15, conduct the trial.

Evidence at Trial

Courts rely on witness testimony, medical reports, and site plans. For example, a site plan can show whether a place was open to the public. Likewise, caste certificates prove the victim’s status. Unfortunately, hostile witnesses often weaken cases. Consequently, witness protection matters greatly.

Timelines and Appeals

The amended law expects courts to finish trials within two months of the chargesheet, as far as possible. In practice, delays remain common. Section 14A provides an appeal to the High Court against judgments, sentences, and bail orders. Typically, the appeal window is 90 days.

Preventive Action

Besides punishment, the law also stresses prevention. Under Section 17, a magistrate can declare an area atrocity-prone and act accordingly. Similarly, Section 10 lets a Special Court direct a person likely to commit atrocities to leave an area for up to three years.

Rights of Victims and Witnesses Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989

The 2015 amendment added a full chapter on victims’ rights to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989. Consequently, victims now hold enforceable procedural rights.

Core Rights

• Protection: The State must protect victims, dependants, and witnesses from threats and inducement.
• Dignity: Authorities must treat victims with fairness, dignity, and respect.
• Notice: Victims receive timely notice of court proceedings, including bail hearings.
• Hearing: Victims may be heard at bail, discharge, parole, conviction, and sentencing stages.
• Support: The State arranges travel and maintenance for victims and witnesses during the case.

These safeguards make the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 more than a punishment law. They turn it into a victim-centred framework.

What the Right to Be Heard Means

A right to be heard is not a right to win. Indeed, courts must listen to the victim. However, the court still decides the matter on law and evidence.

Using Section 15A in Practice

First, victims should ask the Special Public Prosecutor for hearing dates. They may also apply to the Special Court for protective orders. In addition, legal aid lawyers can assist those who cannot pay. Hence, victims need not face the process alone.

Relief and Compensation Under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989

The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995, turn the Act into practical relief. Moreover, the 2016 amendment widened this support. As a result, relief now covers 47 offences instead of 22.

How Much Relief Victims Receive

Minimum relief amounts under the 2016 Rules range from ₹85,000 to ₹8.25 lakh, depending on the offence. Furthermore, officials should release admissible relief within seven days. Payments follow case stages, such as medical examination, chargesheet, and conviction.

Rehabilitation Beyond Cash

In addition, rehabilitation matters. For the gravest offences, the Rules may add support such as a family pension or employment for one family member, along with housing and education help. Relief under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 thus has two layers: immediate help and long-term rehabilitation.

Immediate Support

Furthermore, Rule 12(4) requires immediate relief in kind. This includes food, water, clothing, shelter, medical aid, and transport. Additionally, the State must make budget provisions for relief and rehabilitation. Victims should therefore apply early and keep copies of every application.

Anticipatory Bail and Arrest Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989: Sections 18 and 18A

The Statutory Bar

Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 bars anticipatory bail for accused persons. Previously, the old Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provided that remedy. Today, Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, performs the same role. Section 18A, added in 2018, repeats the bar and goes further.

What Section 18A Changes

First, police need no preliminary inquiry before registering an FIR. Second, the investigating officer needs no prior approval to arrest. Third, the bar on anticipatory bail applies despite any court judgment.

Regular Bail After Arrest

Still, regular bail remains available after arrest. The Special Court hears the victim before deciding. Moreover, the High Court can hear appeals against bail orders under Section 14A. The Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 thus controls bail through procedure rather than a total ban.

The Prima Facie Exception

Even so, the bar is not absolute. In Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India (2020), the Supreme Court held that the bar does not apply when the complaint shows no prima facie case under the Act. Likewise, High Courts keep their inherent powers to quash abusive proceedings. Ordinary arrest safeguards under the BNSS also continue to apply.

Landmark Judgments Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989

Courts have shaped the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 for decades. Four decisions matter most.

Subhash Kashinath Mahajan (March 2018)

On 20 March 2018, the Supreme Court issued safeguards in Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra. It required a preliminary inquiry before FIR registration. Additionally, it required approval before arrest. As a result, protests erupted nationwide soon afterward.

The 2018 Amendment and the 2019 Review

In response, Parliament inserted Section 18A in August 2018. Then, on 1 October 2019, a three-judge Bench recalled the Mahajan directions in review. The Court reasoned that the directions encroached on the legislature’s field.

Prathvi Raj Chauhan (February 2020)

On 10 February 2020, the Court upheld Section 18A. However, it preserved the prima facie exception for anticipatory bail. Consequently, the amended framework stands, with a judicial check against baseless complaints.

Shajan Skaria (August 2024)

In Shajan Skaria v. State of Kerala (2024), the Court granted anticipatory bail to a YouTube news editor. First, it held that mere knowledge of a victim’s caste does not make an offence. Moreover, the insult must target the person because of caste. Without a prima facie case, the Section 18 bar did not apply.

Why These Cases Matter Together

Together, these rulings show a balance. Parliament protects victims through firm procedure, while courts guard against baseless prosecution. Consequently, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 operates within a framework of judicial review.

Latest Judgment on the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989: Ramkrishna Chauhan (2026)

On 20 August 2026, a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta quashed SC/ST charges against a school manager. The complaint alleged assault and caste abuse inside a closed room. Notably, the Court found no allegation that anyone outside heard the words. It also found no specific caste-based utterance in the record.

What This Ruling Means

In doing so, the Court applied Hitesh Verma and Karuppudayar again. As a result, abuse behind closed walls does not satisfy the public view requirement. However, the ordinary criminal charges for assault continued. Thus, victims should record who saw or heard the incident. Lawyers will cite this ruling often when they challenge charges under the Scheduled Castes and Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989.

A Further Development

A recent legal-education report states that a three-judge Bench declined on 22 September 2026 to reopen the validity of the 2018 amendment. Readers should confirm the order text on the Supreme Court website before relying on it.

Misuse Claims Under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989: Safeguards for Accused Persons

Admittedly, debate about misuse is long-standing. Nevertheless, in the 2019 review, the Supreme Court observed that misuse is due to human failure and the caste system. Courts therefore scrutinise each case on its facts. The SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 itself contains no exemption for false complaints, yet courts can discard baseless cases.

Common Defences

Accused persons often raise these points:

• The incident did not occur within public view.
• Knowledge of the complainant’s caste is missing.
• No link to caste exists in the insult.
• A caste certificate may be invalid or absent.
• Counterblast litigation may explain the complaint.

Legal Remedies

Accused persons may seek quashing under Section 528 of the BNSS. They may also seek anticipatory bail where no prima facie case exists. In addition, Section 14A allows appeals against adverse orders. This article offers general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for your situation.

What the Data Says About the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 in Practice

First, official figures show a heavy caseload. According to the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, cases against Scheduled Castes under the Act rose from 45,995 in 2020 to 53,372 in 2023. They then eased to 48,669 in 2024.

Meanwhile, convictions improved but remain modest. Cases ending in conviction rose from 2,613 in 2020 to 5,192 in 2024. At the same time, pending trials climbed to 2,87,694 by 2024. These numbers show that enforcement, not legislation, is the larger gap. Experts therefore urge faster trials under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989.

What Should Improve

Speedy trials need more Exclusive Special Courts, trained prosecutors, and witness protection. In addition, regular review meetings can track pendency. Finally, public awareness helps victims claim relief on time.

Institutional Duties

Notably, Section 21 makes the State responsible for effective implementation. It must provide legal aid, support for victims, and periodic surveys. Moreover, Vigilance and Monitoring Committees review enforcement at State and district levels.

How the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 Differs From the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955

Many readers confuse the two laws. Both fight caste discrimination. However, they serve different purposes.

The Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, punishes untouchability. For example, it penalises denying access to shops, temples, or public water sources. Its penalties are generally lighter.

In contrast, the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 targets a wider range of atrocities. It covers violence, sexual offences, property crimes, and public humiliation. Moreover, it creates Special Courts and a relief system. The Act also has stricter bail rules.

Consequently, one incident may attract both laws. Legal advice helps in choosing the right charges.

Role of the National Commissions and Oversight Bodies

Fortunately, several bodies support enforcement. The National Commission for Scheduled Castes works under Article 338 of the Constitution. Similarly, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes works under Article 338A. These commissions investigate complaints, monitor safeguards, and advise the government.

At the State level, governments must set up Vigilance and Monitoring Committees. Besides, district magistrates and police chiefs hold periodic review meetings. Consequently, victims can approach the commissions when local officials fail to act. The SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 thus relies on both courts and administrative oversight.

Common Misconceptions About the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989

Misunderstanding the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 leads to wrong decisions. Therefore, check these common myths.

Myth: Every Complaint Means Automatic Arrest

Actually, arrest is not automatic. Police still need valid grounds under general arrest law. Besides, courts can grant regular bail.

Myth: Any Insult Attracts the Act

Not so. The insult must target the victim’s caste, and certain clauses also require public view.

Myth: The Act Never Applies to Private Spaces

That claim is too broad. Public view governs specific clauses, such as Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s). However, other provisions, such as Section 3(2)(v), carry no such requirement.

Myth: An FIR Can Never Be Quashed

Yet courts keep inherent powers. Accordingly, they can quash proceedings that disclose no offence under the Act.

Practical Guidance for Victims, Employers, and Institutions

Practical steps help everyone who deals with the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989. Victims need speed and proof. Accused persons need early advice. Institutions need clear policies and trained staff.

For Victims

• Above all, report quickly and ask for a free copy of the FIR.
• Name every witness, including bystanders.
• Keep digital proof, such as messages and videos.
• Track relief applications with district officials.

For Accused Persons

First, cooperate with the investigation. Do not contact or threaten the complainant. Instead, route all communication through counsel. Meanwhile, preserve proof of your location and the surrounding facts.

For Employers and Institutions

Caste-based abuse at work or on campus can trigger criminal liability. Therefore, adopt a written anti-discrimination policy. Next, train managers on lawful conduct. In addition, act on complaints promptly and document every step.

Conclusion

The SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 remains India’s primary shield against caste-based atrocities. Both the 2015 and 2018 amendments strengthened it. Meanwhile, courts keep demanding proof of each statutory ingredient. Therefore, victims should document incidents carefully, and accused persons should seek early legal advice. Ultimately, a fair and swift process serves justice for everyone. Anyone dealing with the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act1989 should therefore rely on the statute, the Rules, and current case law.

Key Takeaways

• The Act punishes caste-based atrocities and creates Special Courts.
• Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) need a place within public view.
• Section 18A removes preliminary inquiry and prior approval for arrest.
• The anticipatory bail bar yields where no prima facie case exists.
• Victims have rights to notice, protection, relief, and a hearing.

References

1. India Code. The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1920
2. People’s Archive of Rural India. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/the-scheduled-castes-and-the-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-amendment-act-2015/
3. Vikaspedia. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. https://en.vikaspedia.in/social-welfare/scheduled-caste-welfare-1/the-scheduled-castes-and-the-scheduled-tribes-prevention-of-atrocities-amendment-act-2015
4. Supreme Court of India. Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India, judgment dated 10 February 2020. https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2018/31176/31176_2018_3_1501_20551_Judgement_10-Feb-2020.pdf
5. SCC Online. Supreme Court upholds validity of the 2018 Amendment Act. https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2020/02/10/supreme-court-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-the-sc-st-prevention-of-atrocities-amendment-act-2018/
6. Supreme Court Observer. Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India: case background. https://www.scobserver.in/cases/prithvi-raj-chauhan-union-of-india-legality-of-sc-st-act-amendment-case-background/
7. Supreme Court Observer. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan: Court recalls its order. https://www.scobserver.in/journal/subhash-kashinath-mahajan-court-recalls-its-order/
8. Supreme Court Observer. Review petition judgment in plain English. https://www.scobserver.in/reports/prathvi-raj-chauhan-union-of-india-legality-sc-st-amendment-act-judgment-in-plain-english-review-petition/
9. The Leaflet. SC/ST Act: Supreme Court recalls its 2018 verdict. https://theleaflet.in/supreme-court/sc-st-act-supreme-court-amends-its-2018-verdict-on-governments-plea
10. LiveLaw. Mere insult is not an offence unless it is on account of caste (Hitesh Verma). https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/mere-insult-of-a-person-is-not-an-offence-unless-it-is-on-account-of-himher-belonging-to-sc-st-165538
11. LiveLaw. Caste abuse in a chamber with no one else present (Karuppudayar). https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/caste-based-abuse-within-chamber-of-govt-officer-when-no-one-else-was-present-not-scst-act-offence-supreme-court-282609
12. LiveLaw. Caste abuse inside an enclosed space is not an SC/ST Act offence (Ramkrishna Chauhan, 2026). https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/caste-abuse-inside-enclosed-space-scst-act-offence-supreme-court-546722
13. Verdictum. Shajan Skaria v. State of Kerala, 2024 INSC 625. https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/shajan-skaria-v-the-state-of-kerala-2024-insc-625-anticipatory-bail-438-crpc-1549059
14. LiveLaw. No bar on anticipatory bail unless a prima facie offence is made out. https://www.livelaw.in/amp/top-stories/scst-act-no-bar-on-anticipatory-bail-unless-prima-facie-offence-is-made-out-supreme-court-267552
15. LiveLaw. The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Rules, 2016 notified. https://www.livelaw.in/amp/scheduled-castes-scheduled-tribes-prevention-atrocities-amendment-rules-2016-notified
16. Press Information Bureau. Initiatives for SC Welfare (Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment). https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2022/apr/doc20224737401.pdf
17. Press Information Bureau. Cases registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2020 to 2024. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2291974&reg=48&lang=2
18. National Crime Records Bureau. Crime in India 2022. https://www.ncrb.gov.in/uploads/nationalcrimerecordsbureau/custom/1701607577CrimeinIndia2022Book1.pdf
19. Delhi Law Academy. SC/ST Act Explained: 2018 judgment, 2020 ruling and latest position. https://www.delhilawacademy.com/sc-st-act-explained/